Computing.Net > Forums > Windows Server 2003 > Do I really have to use antivirus?

Computing.Net: Over 1,000,000 posts about all things technology related! Over 90% answered within 24 hours! Click here to sign up now, it's free!

Do I really have to use antivirus?

Reply to Message Icon

Original Message
Name: Kay Tee Pren Tiss
Date: March 9, 2008 at 09:18:24 Pacific
Subject: Do I really have to use antivirus?
OS: Windows XP Clients and Wi
CPU/Ram: Pentium 3, Pentium 4, Pen
Manufacturer/Model: Multiple, from Dell to Cu
Comment:

Hello, I have a Domain Controller (AD) running Windows Server 2003 an I have a few clients (Some 2000, 98, Vista or even ME) but most of them run XP Pro.

Now, all my computers appear to be slow eversince I installed all my programs on it. Before program installation, the computer started up and ran programs faster. I clean installed XP Pro on my old Dell 8200 System without installing any virus software and the computer was lightning fast! The virus software is McAfee Virusscan Enterprise 8.5. I tried installing Symantec Antivirus Coorporate Edition on my server and that took up all my CPU on it which made my network slow, so I had to uninstall that.

Now, maybe the solution to having FAST COMPUTERS is to NOT install and deploy antivirus software to my clients. Now, is this a security risk? Why does Antivirus Software take up so much CPU usage? Do I HAVE to install antivirus software my clients? I mean once I join the domain, Windows XP stops bugging me to install a Virus software. Why can't I just install an antivirus software on a server and the server scans all my domain computers?

Kute Punk Kay Pee Kay Tee Pren Tiss Kute Punk Kay Pee Kay Tee Pren Tiss


Report Offensive Message For Removal


Response Number 1
Name: jefro
Date: March 9, 2008 at 10:24:01 Pacific
Reply:

Everything is a trade off.
You have to decide your risk level.
AV is a part of best practices. The more you use the safer your data is.

I read it wrong and answer it wrong too. So get off my case you peanut.


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 2
Name: paulsep
Date: March 9, 2008 at 12:37:54 Pacific
Reply:

Every PC, that can connect to the internet, receive e-mails a.s.o. is potentially at risk to be infected by a virus.

Also e.g. lets say that only one workstation can connect to the internet but also has connection to servers or other workstations in your local network,
all other workstations and servers are at risk and must run anti virus software.

I know, it slows down the performance but, if you don't use anti virus software, you maybe have to reinstall servers, workstations or loose your data.

So the question is, is it worth to try without anti virus.

It's also recommended to use a firewall !!!


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 3
Name: mr.slon
Date: March 25, 2008 at 07:05:35 Pacific
Reply:

keep you w2003 always updated is more important than AV (my opinion) our company servers win2003 ent. as AD and win2003 Web-Ed as web server have only sheduled windows updates and the antivirus for incoming e-mails (integrated to e-mail server) to prevent workstations infection... everything works about 5 years.

Jeff


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal

Response Number 4
Name: peej
Date: March 31, 2008 at 21:31:21 Pacific
Reply:

get avg free or threatfire.
works great on workstations and uses very little resources, and its free!


Report Offensive Follow Up For Removal







Post Locked

This post is quite old and has been locked from receiving new replies. Please create a new posting instead.


Go to Windows Server 2003 Forum Home



Results for: Do I really have to use antivirus?

Migration PDC NT 4.0 to W2K3
    Summary: We are a small office and we have been running for ever this NT 4.0 Server (old server 1) as our PDC and file server. (No exchange server in this scenario, yet!) Now that our business needs changed w...
www.computing.net/answers/windows-2003/migration-pdc-nt-40-to-w2k3-/3005.html

renaming domain controller
    Summary: i set up a lab with two xp pro computers and server 03. i need to change the domain name; i.e., i need to lose part of it. my server (computer name) is "local." the domain name is "office.companyn...
www.computing.net/answers/windows-2003/renaming-domain-controller/605.html

Router as NAT, but Server 2003 DHCP
    Summary: Thank Wanderer for your suggestion. I think I might have not stated my questions clearly. I am actually using your and Curt R suggestion to implement the setup for 1st OBJECTIVE only. This is the T...
www.computing.net/answers/windows-2003/router-as-nat-but-server-2003-dhcp/5934.html








Which MP3 player do you have?

iPod/iPhone
Zune
Something Else
None


View Results

Poll Finishes Today.
Discuss in The Lounge
Poll History






Data Recovery Software